Razed license, operator identity and player safeguards
Table of Contents
- Razed’s terms name Anjouan and licence ALSI-132405034-FI3
- Wild Technology Ltd is the operator named in Razed’s terms
- Terms reviews and complaint records point in different directions
- An offshore dispute usually depends on account records and the route written into the terms
- Razed is not available everywhere
- Questions about Razed licensing and safety
- Razed’s Anjouan licence is only one part of the risk picture
Section element
Licensing and dispute context
Razed’s terms identify Wild Technology Ltd as the operator and state that the website is licensed and regulated by the Government of the Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros, under licence ALSI-132405034-FI3. Licensing defines part of the legal framework, while account terms and local law still matter to an individual player.
Section element
- Primary licence jurisdictionAnjouan, Union of Comoros
- Licence identifierALSI-132405034-FI3
- Casino Guru Safety Index7.3 — Above average
- AskGamblers rating8.1/10 from 16 reviews
Razed’s terms name Anjouan and licence ALSI-132405034-FI3
Razed’s terms state that the website is licensed and regulated by the Government of the Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros. The same terms identify licence number ALSI-132405034-FI3.
The terms also identify the operating company as Wild Technology Ltd, registration number 3-102-898807, with a registered address in San José, Costa Rica. The licensing jurisdiction and the company registration location are different pieces of the operator structure and should not be treated as the same jurisdiction.
What the licence can establish
A current register entry can connect a licence holder, a domain and a regulatory framework. It can also identify the route for a formal complaint if the operator does not resolve an issue directly.
What it cannot establish by itself
A licence does not tell you whether every withdrawal will be fast, how a particular account dispute will be resolved, or whether home-country consumer protections apply. Those questions depend on the account terms, the facts of the dispute and local law.
Wild Technology Ltd is the operator named in Razed’s terms
Razed’s terms identify Wild Technology Ltd as the company that owns and operates the website. The terms give registration number 3-102-898807 and a registered address in San José, Costa Rica.
For an account or payment dispute, keep the transaction history, account messages and the terms that applied to the account. The Razed account guide explains identity and funding checks, while the withdrawal guide covers cashout steps and possible account-review delays.
- Operator
- Wild Technology Ltd
- Company registration
- 3-102-898807, Costa Rica
- Licence
- ALSI-132405034-FI3, Anjouan, Union of Comoros
Terms reviews and complaint records point in different directions
Casino Guru gives Razed a 7.3 Safety Index, labelled “Above average,” and its review did not identify unfair or predatory clauses. A separate terms review reached a more cautious conclusion, flagging broad discretion around confiscation, further damages, an inactivity fee, Anjouan-only arbitration and the possibility of reversing a pending cashout. These assessments conflict, so neither should be treated as the single final reading of the contract.
AskGamblers displays complaint cases with mixed outcomes, while Trustpilot contains both positive and negative player experiences. Complaint platforms can show recurring subjects such as withdrawal delays or account checks, but an individual review does not determine what will happen to another account.
| Signal | What the record shows | How to use it |
|---|---|---|
| Casino Guru | Safety Index 7.3; no unfair or predatory clauses found in its review | Useful independent benchmark, not a substitute for reading the current terms |
| Independent terms review | Several clauses were flagged as risky, including discretionary remedies and arbitration wording | Check the exact clauses that apply to your account before a dispute arises |
| AskGamblers complaints | Mixed complaint outcomes are visible | Use the case details to understand the type of dispute rather than assuming one outcome |
| Trustpilot feedback | Hundreds of reviews with strongly positive and strongly negative experiences | Look for repeated themes; do not treat individual reviews as proof |
Signals that reduce uncertainty
- A named offshore licensing jurisdiction is consistently associated with the site.
- Casino Guru reports an above-average Safety Index.
- Complaint platforms show that some disputes have reached a recorded outcome.
Signals that deserve closer reading
- Offshore licensing does not automatically create the same remedies as a local licence.
- Terms assessments differ materially.
- Player feedback includes withdrawal and verification disputes.
An offshore dispute usually depends on account records and the route written into the terms
Razed is presented as an offshore operator rather than a casino holding a local licence in every country where a user may live. That changes the practical route if a balance is frozen, a withdrawal is delayed, or an account is closed. A national gambling authority in your home country may have no role in the dispute, so the contract and the licensing body named for the operator become more important.
- Preserve the transaction trail. Save deposit and withdrawal hashes, balance history, timestamps and the messages that explain any hold or cancellation.
- Use the operator’s formal support route. State the amount, date, transaction reference and requested remedy in one chronological record.
- Read the dispute and arbitration clauses. Identify the entity named in the terms, the applicable complaint route and any time limits.
- Escalate through the stated licensing channel when applicable. Match the live domain and operator identity to the current register before relying on a licence number.
- Keep local law separate from offshore licensing. Whether you are allowed to gamble online and what consumer remedies you have depends on the law where you live.
Razed’s terms also make the account holder responsible for providing accurate registration information and for complying with the restrictions attached to the service. A dispute can therefore involve more than the payment itself: account identity, local eligibility, bonus conditions and game rules may all be relevant depending on what happened before the balance was frozen or a request was declined.
The same terms state that the company can change its conditions and that players should review updates that affect the contractual relationship. For practical use, save the terms or account message that applies when a material issue occurs, especially if a bonus, account restriction or cashout decision depends on a specific clause.
Licensing also does not remove ordinary gambling risk. A regulator can set rules for an operator, but it cannot make casino outcomes predictable or eliminate the financial risk created by repeated wagering. Legal status, payment reliability and game mathematics are different questions even when they appear on the same casino account.
Razed is not available everywhere
Razed’s terms contain jurisdiction and game-availability restrictions, and the website is not intended to create lawful access where local rules prohibit online gambling. Game providers can also impose their own country restrictions for particular titles.
A practical check has two parts: first, confirm that the site accepts users where you live; second, confirm that online casino play itself is allowed under your local law. Being able to open an account does not answer the legal question for your location.
Provider restrictions can be narrower than the casino’s general country rules. Razed’s terms list country limitations for some NetEnt and other supplier games, which means an account can have access to the casino while a particular title remains unavailable. That distinction matters when comparing game availability across locations.
For the rest of the brand picture without repeating regulatory material, return to the Razed review, which separates payments, games, bonus and account mechanics from this licensing analysis.
Game restrictions can be especially granular. Razed’s terms list country exclusions for certain provider titles in addition to general account restrictions. That means legal access to the website and access to a specific game are not identical questions. A player may be able to sign in while a supplier blocks one title or category for the player’s location.
Local rules remain the final consideration for the player’s side of the transaction. An offshore licence can authorize the operator within its own framework, but it does not grant permission to gamble in a country where the activity is restricted. Account access should therefore never be used as proof that local participation is lawful.
Questions about Razed licensing and safety
What licence is Razed associated with?
Razed’s terms state that the website is licensed and regulated by the Government of the Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros.
What licence number does Razed list?
Razed’s terms list licence number ALSI-132405034-FI3.
Who operates Razed?
Razed’s terms identify Wild Technology Ltd as the website operator and give company registration number 3-102-898807 in Costa Rica.
Does a Razed licence guarantee that disputes will be resolved?
No. Licensing defines a regulatory framework, but dispute outcomes also depend on the contract, account records, account history and the complaint route available at the time.
Razed’s Anjouan licence is only one part of the risk picture
Razed’s terms identify Wild Technology Ltd, the Anjouan licensing jurisdiction and licence ALSI-132405034-FI3. Those details define part of the operator framework, but they do not guarantee a particular dispute outcome or replace the gambling laws that apply where a player lives.
